x
uploads/forejudge.jpg

forejudge vt.【法律】(由法庭判決)驅逐,逐出,剝奪(某種權利)...

foreknow

At present , with regard to our country ' s research on european integration , a large portion of scholars focuses on the analysis of its forming process and developing status and the forejudge of its developing foreground , while few analyzing its advancing process from the angle of the theory the european integration relies on and the development of the theory , also few giving theoretical annotation on the capriciousness of the european integration from the point of theoretical comparison , intrinsic lack and positive value 目前,我國對于歐洲一體化的研究,大部分學者都聚焦于對其形成過程、發展狀況的分析以及對其發展前景的預斷,而很少從歐洲一體化所依托的理論及理論發展的角度去分析歐洲一體化的推進過程,很少從歐洲一體化的理論比較、內在缺失和積極價值的視角,對歐洲一體化進程的反復做出理論上的詮釋。

Set out from the peculiar procedure value , function and purpose of the public prosecution , the construction of the concrete mode of this system should be followed the principles of judicial examination on the subject , and substantive examination on the range and the rules avoiding the forejudge , basing on fact and taking law as criterion , in order to accord with the legal spirit and procedural theory of the public prosecution 從公訴審查特有的訴訟價值、功能和目的出發,公訴審查制度具體模式的構建應當遵循審查主體上的司法審查原則、審查范圍上的以定罪為中心的實體審原則、排除庭審法官預斷的原則以及以事實為根據以法律為準繩的原則和及時審理原則等,以符合公訴審查制度所內涵的法律精神和訴訟理念。

The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past . in practice , it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults , for example , the definition of the main evidence is not clear , the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough . in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode , we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide , combine our country ' s conditions , on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past , on the procedural theory , change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination , in practice regard legitimacy , rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise , in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly , add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge , regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure 以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導,結合我國的國情,對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善,在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子;在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念,以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實;在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則;在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據,其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據,增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度,補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對于人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的,取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定,改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。