x
uploads/feuerbach.jpg

feuerbach L. A. 費爾巴哈〔1804-1872,德國哲學家〕。

feuilletonist

The second part and the third in this text explain the youth marx ' s animadversion , succession and transcendency to the dialectical alienation idea of hegel and humanitarian alienation thought of feuerbach respectively , and point out the alienation thought of youth marx primarily is in the base of hegelian dialectics thought and feuerbach ' s humanism thought and the revolution practice of marx himself 本文的第二、三部分分別說明了青年馬克思對黑格爾辯證異化觀及費爾巴哈人本主義異化思想的批判、繼承及其超越,特別論述了青年馬克思異化思想主要是在吸收黑格爾的辯證法思想及費爾巴哈的人本主義思想的基礎上結合馬克思本人的革命實踐而形成的。

Although ludwig feuerbach could not truly overcome the speculation philosophy , for the sensible and objective principle lacked the dimension of history and activity , it has already made ludwig feuerbach to stand in the world entrance of new philosophy , and has achieved the same theoretical level as that of persons at the same time of youth hegel 盡管費爾巴哈的“感性對象性原則”由于缺少“歷史”和“活動”的維度,并不能真正地克服思辮哲學,但“感性對象性原則”本身的提出卻已經使得費爾巴哈站在新哲學世界的入口處,并達到了他的青年黑格爾派的同時代人所能達到的最高理論水平。

The two long - neglected facts disclosed in on the two facts of relationships between marx and feuerbach are of subversive significance , from which we can infer that marxist philosophy is not traditional humanism , not transcendentalism , nor traditional materialism ; marx ' s philosophical revolution is not a simple combination of metaphysics and materialism , but an inheritance and transcendence of feuerbach ' s dialectical materialism , a new materialism assuming practice as the core 《關于馬克思和費爾巴哈關系的兩個事實》一文所揭示的長期被我們忽視的兩個事實具有顛覆性意義,我們據此可以明確推論:馬克思主義哲學不是傳統的人道主義,不是超越論,也不是傳統理解的辯證唯物主義;馬克思的哲學革命不是辯證法和唯物主義的簡單結合,而是對費爾巴哈的辯證唯物主義的繼承和超越,是以實踐為核心的新唯物主義。

To retrospect and clear the course of ontology ' s naissance , development and perfection is very important for us to understand the respective status of feuerbach ' s philosophy and marxism philosophy , and the successive relationship in scientific basis between the two philosophies as well 追憶并厘清這一本體論的產生、發展和完善的歷程,對于我們今天重新理解費爾巴哈哲學和馬克思哲學在哲學史上的地位、以及他們之間在學理上的承傳關系,乃具有重大的意義。

The chief defect of all hitherto existing materialism ( that of feuerbach included ) is that the thing , reality , sensuousness , is conceived only in the form of the _ object or of contemplation _ , but not as _ sensuous human activity , practice _ , not subjectively 迄今為止包括費爾巴哈在內的現存的唯物主義的主要缺點在于對于事物,現實和感性只是從客體或者直觀的形式去理解,而不是把它們當作人的感性的活動,當作實踐去理解,不是從主觀去理解。

In addition , this article is also detailed analyzed and demonstrated feuerbach ’ s “ theory of psychological compulsion ” background , contribution of theory , the defects and shortcomings . feuerbach “ theory of psychological compulsion ” has been not only influenced by the prevailing macro and socio - political background , 此外,本文還對費氏“心理強制說”的產生背景、理論貢獻以及存在的缺陷與不足等展開了詳實的分析和論述。

Marx , karl . selections from marx engels reader : “ society and economy in history “ ( pp . 136 - 142 ) , “ theses on feuerbach “ ( pp . 143 - 145 ) , “ the german ideology , “ part i ( up to “ the real basis of ideology “ ) , pp . 146 - 176 摘自《馬克思與恩格司文選》 :歷史上的社會與經濟(第136 - 142頁) 、費爾巴哈的論述(第143 - 145頁) 、德意志意識形態第一部分(至意識形態的真實基礎) ,第146 - 176頁。

By analyzing of feuerbach ’ s “ theory of psychological compulsion ” logical structure , feuerbach ’ s “ theory of psychological compulsion ” should be attributed to the integration theory , namely that the legislative general prevention is with the combination of the legal retribution 通過對費氏“心理強制說”的邏輯展析,得出其刑罰根據論應該歸于一體論,即立法一般預防與法律報應相結合。

On this historical link , the progress of philosophy could only display ludwig feuerbach ' s critique , and it is the historical inevitability of marx ' s economic and philosophy critique in economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844 在這一歷史環節上,哲學的進步只能表現為對費爾巴哈的批判;在這里出現的乃是《 1844年經濟學哲學手稿》中馬克思經濟學哲學批判的歷史必然性。

Since 200 years , feuerbach ’ s “ theory of psychological compulsion ” has been paid the world widely attention by the criminal jurist all over the world , and has played an important role in the modern technology of the process about the ideology of criminal law 200年來,費氏“心理強制說”一直受到世界各國刑法學家的廣泛關注,在刑法思想近代化的過程中發揮過重要作用。

At present , china ’ s criminal law scholars cite or quote more increasingly feuerbach ’ s “ theory of psychological compulsion ” in their criminology literatures . however , what is feuerbach ’ s “ theory of psychological compulsion ” on earth 當前,我國刑法學者也在各類刑法學論著中越來越多地引用或者轉述費氏“心理強制說” ,但是,費氏“心理強制說”究竟為何物

In 1804 , feuerbach , a german learner who studied criminal law theory , first adopted the theory of impossibility in his works and made it on issue in the criminal law . since then , the debate about impossibility has not been over 1804年德國刑法學者費爾巴哈率先運用了不能犯理論并使其成為刑法上的問題,自此,圍繞著不能犯的論爭就沒有停止過。

Feuerbach , consequently , does not see that the “ religious sentiment “ is itself a social product , and that the abstract individual whom he analyses belongs to a particular form of society 因此費爾巴哈沒有認識到“宗教感情“自身是一種社會的產物,并且他分析的抽象個體自身屬于一種社會上的特定形式。

Criticism of hegel ' s reflective philosophy is the core of ludwig feuerbach ' s thoughts , and the sensible and objective principle is the standpoint of his criticism of reflective philosophy 摘要對黑格爾思辨哲學的批判是費爾巴哈思想的核心,而“感性對象性原則”則是費爾巴哈批判思辮哲學的立足點。

Feuerbach , who is named as “ the father of modern science of criminal law ” , is the germany penal jurist . the core of his theory of criminal law is the “ theory of psychological compulsion ” 費爾巴哈,一位被人們譽為“近代刑法學之父”的德國刑法學家,其刑法理論的核心就是“心理強制說” 。

This paper introduces the theory of practice by such figures as kant , hegel , and feuerbach and then elaborates the steps marx took in critically inheriting his predecessors ' achievements 摘要介紹了康德、黑格爾、費爾巴哈關于實踐的論述,闡述了馬克思對前人研究成果批判性繼承的過程。

The thought of objectivity of karl marx in the economic and philosophical manuscripts in 1844 is , diffevent from hegel and feuerbach ' s , a nastic objective activity 摘要馬克思《 1844年經濟學哲學手稿》中包含的對象性思想,是有別于黑格爾、費爾巴哈的對象性,是感性的對象性活動。

Feuerbach , not satisfied with abstract thinking , wants contemplation ; but he does not conceive sensuousness as practical , human - sensuous activity 費爾巴哈并不滿足于抽象的思考,而想要訴諸于感性的直觀;但是他并不把感性的當做實踐的人類感性的活動。

Feuerbach wants sensuous objects , really distinct from the thought objects , but he does not conceive human activity itself as _ objective _ activity 費爾巴哈想研究與思想的客體完全不同的感性的客體,但是他沒有意識到把人類活動本身也作為客體的活動。